Cic edizioni internazionali
Clinical Cases in mineral and bone metabolism

Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty

Mini-review, 97 - 110
doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2013.10.2.097
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Background. Symptomatic severe osteoarthritis and hip osteoporotic fractures are the main conditions requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA), whereas total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is mainly performed for pain, disability or deformity due to osteoarthritis. After surgery, some patients suffer from “painful prosthesis”, which currently represents a clinical problem.
Methods. A systematic review of scientific literature has been performed. A panel of experts has examined the issue of persistent pain following total hip or knee arthroplasty, in order to characterize etiopathological mechanisms and define how to cope with this condition.
Results. Four major categories (non infective, septic, other and idiopathic causes) have been identified as possible origin of persistent pain after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Time to surgery, pain level and function impairment before surgical intervention, mechanical stress following prosthesis implant, osseointegration deficiency, and post-traumatic or allergic inflammatory response are all factors playing an important role in causing persistent pain after joint arthroplasty. Diagnosis of persistent pain should be made in case of post-operative pain (self-reported as VAS ≥3) persisting for at least 4 months after surgery, or new onset of pain (VAS ≥3) after the first 4 months, lasting ≥2 months. Acute pain reported as VAS score ≥7 in patients who underwent TJA should be always immediately investigated.
Conclusions. The cause of pain needs always to be indentified and removed whenever possible. Implant revision is indicated only when septic or aseptic loosening is diagnosed. Current evidence has shown that peri-and/or post-operative administration of bisphosphonates may have a role in pain management and periprosthetic bone loss prevention.

Vol. XIII (No. 2) 2016 May-August

  1. From the Editor-in-Chief
    Brandi M.L.
  2. Calcio, vitamina D e fratture: domande e risposte
    Brandi M.L.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.081
  3. Implications of analgesics use in osteoporotic-related pain treatment: focus on opioids
    Vellucci R., Mattia C., Celidonio L., Mediati R.D.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.089
  4. The role of drugs in bone pain
    Marras F., Tranquilli Leali P.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.093
  5. Bone pain mechanism in osteoporosis: a narrative review
    Mattia C., Coluzzi F., Celidonio L., Vellucci R.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.097
  6. Bone healing in 2016
    Buza III J.A., Einhorn T.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.101
  7. Abaloparatide
    Gonnelli S., Caffarelli C.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.106
  8. Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: a review of clinical appearance and metabolic pattern
    Beltrami G., Ristori G., Scoccianti G., Tamburini A., Capanna R.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.110
  9. Underdiagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients with fragility fractures: retrospective analysis of over 300 patients
    Bottai V., Giannotti S., Raffaetà G., Mazzantini M., Casella F., De Paola G., Menconi A., Falossi F., Guido G.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.119
  10. Risk factors of mortality during the first year after low energy osteoporosis fracture: a retrospective case-control study
    Lloret A., Coiffier G., Couchouron T., Perdriger A., Guggenbuhl P.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.123
  11. Rates and reasons for lack of persistence with anti-osteoporotic drugs: analysis of the Campania region database
    Iolascon G., Gimigliano F., Moretti A., Riccio I., Di Gennaro M., Illario M., Monetti V.M., Orlando V., Menditto E.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.127
  12. Hyaluronic acid in the management of osteoarthritis: injection therapies innovations
    Santilli V., Paoloni M., Mangone M., Alviti F., Bernetti A.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.131
  13. The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis
    Burke C.J., Didolkar M.M., Barnhart H.X., Vinson E.N.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.135
  14. Evaluation of the bone mineral density of the subjects with avascular necrosis of hip joint
    Taghi Karimi M., Mousavi Nodoshan S.M.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.141
  15. Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants
    Cozzi Lepri A., Giorgini M., Signorini C., Carulli C., Civinini R., Brandi M.L., Innocenti M.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.144
  16. Low-energy trauma-induced intercondylar femoral fracture
    Aeby M., Wyss T., Mentrup B., Kunstmann E., Jakob F., Aeberli D.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.151
  17. Early onset acute tubular necrosis following single infusion of zoledronate
    Yachoui R.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.154
  18. Concomitant extraspinal hyperostosis and osteoporosis in a patient with congenital ichthyosis
    Torkamani N., Phal P., Savarirayan R., Simm P., Varigos G., Wark J.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.2.157
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty
    Piscitelli P., Iolascon G., Innocenti M., Civinini R., Rubinacci A., Muratore M., D’Arienzo M., Tranquilli Leali P., Carossino A.M., Brandi M.L.
    doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2013.10.2.097
credits